THE OTHERS

My father is a 1960 batch IPS officer. He retired in 1995 and, at eighty years of age, spends more time at the golf course than his doctor would like.

IPS officers heading Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) like BSF, CRPF, SSB, CISF and ITBP, is the topic of many a heated dinnertime debate.

Debating with him is never easy. But over a period of time, he has started conceding that it is time that CAPFs had their own cadre. There is grudging acceptance that they must have a direct entry officer as Director General and Chief. Dad is eighty, but still carries the recoil of a 303 Lee Enfield bolt-action rifle.

A uniformed force is made up of tradition, training, honour, blood, death, victory, defeat, brotherhood and leadership. That is the nature of uniformed forces everywhere. “We are good enough to die. We are just not good enough to lead”, says a CAPF officer to me, bitterly. Resentment against the IPS cadre runs deep in CAPFs.

I have a lot of respect for IPS officers. They are brilliant and erudite. They know their job. But their job is not guarding the borders, anti-Naxal operations or counter-insurgency operations. They are brilliant at police work. That is where they belong. That is where they must stay.

A vast majority of IPS officers have no experience in counter insurgency, internal security, anti terrorism and border management. But they will para-drop one fine morning, from a state cadre, to head a professional force comprising of hundreds of thousands of men and women. They will, without one day’s experience in anything apart from state police work, lead a force, which is neck deep in counter insurgency, anti-Naxal operations, border-management and riot control.

They will be there for two years and in those two years, will possibly spend a year understanding that force. After that, in a bid for immortality, they will initiate changes in the force so that they are remembered. And these changes will set back the force by years.

If you are an officer of the CAPFs, know this. You may have fantastic leadership skills, be professionally excellent and display great operational expertise, but you are like the Pandavas gambling with dice. The dice are loaded against you. You have lost the game even before you started playing it.

The CAPFs are an important and integral part of our national security profile. But they need to be fundamentally changed. It will cause pain and acute discomfort, but that is in intrinsic part of any operation.

We must give the CAPFs (Central Armed Police Forces) their own unique identity. There are two ways to do it.

The first option is the army way. Make them Para Military forces like the Assam Rifles and have army officers coming in for deputation for a fixed period of 3 years. After 6 years, when two rotations are complete, the force will settle down and the CAPFs (now full fledged para military forces) will complement the army. They will get the same type of training and culture that the Indian Army has…hard driving and aggressive. But this option has many flaws. The CAPFs operate amongst the local populace, far more than the army does. Their job is peculiar and complex. Sometimes, the sheer complexity is mind-boggling.

The only solution is Option Two, and that is for the CAPFs to have their own cadre. What are the practical steps that can lead to the overall professionalization of CAPFs?

The Border Security Force (BSF), Shasastra Seema Bal (SSB) and Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) must be combined into one force and entity. Similarly, the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) must be combined to into one cohesive entity. The BSF, SSB and ITBP combine can be called Indian Border Guards of IBG. The CRPF and CISF combine can be called the Homeland Security Force or HSF.

The acts and rules of these forces must change completely. They must cease to be “central police” forces. When they are called for helping the state police, they should not be placed under the local police. These forces have been called because the state police either do not have the resources or are not competent enough to handle the situation. It would be a better idea to put the local police under these forces. These forces must act independently. When the state police requisitions them, all infrastructure and facilities must be provided to them before they deploy. You can’t have your saviors staying in under construction building without running water or electricity. The states must fulfill their responsibilities. A case in point…on 3 April 2017, a CRPF Sub-Inspector fell to his death from the stairs because the accommodation provided for CRPF by J&K government was an under construction building. It was dark and there were no railings. The CRPF was deployed for by-elections, on the request for the state government.

The uniform of these forces must be changed. Three types of uniforms are good enough…ceremonial, official and operational. Operational uniform can change with the terrain; jungle, high altitude, plains or desert. They must not wear khaki. It is too closely associated with the police identity.

Current ranks must go. You cannot have senior level officers being designated as DIG, IG or DG. It is too “police”. Any relationship to police must be erased from existence and memory.

There must be a cut off date for having a cadre officer as the head of the force. Lets say it takes 15 years to bring the force to such a level where a direct entry officer can become the Chief of the force. For those 15 years, the Indian Army will have to pitch in. The Government of India must nominate two General Officers who have successfully completed their tenures as Army Commanders. GOC-in-Cs who have commanded the Western Army and the Northern Army would be prime candidates. Those who are not in line for COAS may be chosen. By an act of Parliament, they must be given a fixed tenure of 5 years, post their Army Command.

These general officers will have a clear, written roadmap and deliverables. I know the Indian Army. They will deliver. Earthquakes and tsunamis are not acceptable excuses in the army. An order is given. It is carried out.

Each such General Officer who takes over as Chief of these two forces will bring a team of 250 officers, JCOs and NCOs with him, from the Indian Army. This will be Core Training Team. The truth is that there are no better instructors than the Indian Army. Indian Army Generals will man all current positions of Additional DG, Special DG and DG. They will have a clear and written mandate to develop the cadre officers in 15 years. And in that stipulated time, all Indian Army officers will either go back to army or retire. Those who were born in it MUST lead the force. In the 15th year, the Chief of IBG and HSF will be a directly appointed officer.

The Government of India must sanction land and funds to create top class training institutions just like the Indian Army has. These new forces must have a separate YO wing, Junior Command, Staff College, Senior Command, Higher Command and NDC like institutions. Institutions like CIJWS, HAWS and commando wing need to be created, along professional lines.

Direct entry at the JCO/ ASI level must stop. This rank at the direct entry level has no relevance. Ranks equivalent to Lance Naik (one stripe) and Naik (two stripes) must be introduced. Like in the army, if they are capable, they will rise. If not, they should be sent home.

During training, under-trainee officers must be considered cadets. They should not be officers. You cannot pass an exam and become an officer. You have to earn that honour. In the army, Gentlemen Cadets are put through the grind. If they are capable and prove themselves, they become officers. Many leave in between, not able to cope with training. Army training is not nice. They do their best to break you. That must be the core-training ethos of these two new forces.

Once these officers pass out from their academies, they must each spend a year with an Indian Army battalion in operations. And they must start off with commanding a platoon and after 6 months; move on to become company 2iCs. They should be understudies of an experienced company commander. After one year with the Indian Army, they should directly go for their Young Officers Course of their respective forces. The age for direct entry officers must be capped at 25 years. The younger, the better.

It is critical to develop “regimentation” in these forces. Without regimentation, a force has no identity. Currently, you may join one battalion after passing out and after three years, find yourself in another battalion. You may never serve in the battalion that you were commissioned into. Loyalty takes a hit. You have no emotional moorings. There are many aspects to regimentation and the Core Training Group must delve deeply into it. Even now, when army officers speak about me, its always “I spoke to Major Gaurav Arya…woh Kumaon Regiment wala”. I know the Indian Army well. Even when I die, they will say, “MGA passed away…woh Kumaon Regiment wala”.

Multiple officer entries must be stopped. There must be only two entries – direct and technical. You should not be able to be promoted to officer rank. Like in the army, you must go through the Academy (ACC Wing at IMA).

There must be immediate modernization of these forces, with a slew of new equipment including artillery, limited airlift capability, limited salt-water and riverine capability and armored troop carriers.

Both these forces must be young forces. It’s sad to see 55-year-old inspectors trudging along uneven terrain, unable to cope. National Security is a serious business. It must be merit based. Anything else is a compromise.

Once these steps are effectively implemented, India can start the next steps. Except for Siachen and some other critical patches, the Indian Army must move out and over a period of 15 years, hand over most border areas to IBG troops. This will, off course, be done after developing capabilities. Indian Army must move to locations behind borders. I say this because the Indian Army is an offensive force. It must be used in war. That’s the DNA of the Indian Army.

Once this is done, we should actively look at foreign bases for deployment of the Indian Armed Forces. Africa, Central Asia and the Indian Ocean are where we must have theater commands. Outward projection of military power is what we must aim at. And that is only possible when you have strong, professional, well-equipped and motivated forces to guard India.

For too long we have treated CAPFs as India’s stepchildren. They are neither army nor police. And yet, thousands of them have laid down their lives defending India from internal and external threats. They deserve to lead their own force.

They have shed enough blood.

Major Gaurav Arya (Veteran)

17th Battalion, The Kumaon Regiment

Indian Army

#MajorGauravArya #TheOthers #adgpi #IndianArmy

 

Author: Major Gaurav Arya (Veteran)

Editor In Chief - Chanakya Forum

39 thoughts on “THE OTHERS”

  1. This article may serve as an eye-opener to many. The outline of the solutions to the problems is so well-defined, and calls for adequate attention towards it. The only question that remains unanswered is who will bell the cat !

    Like

  2. CAPF don’t require army to train. We have capable instructor and leaders. Earlier there were army officers and instructors but they were phased out because we created better lots. As far as IPS is concern they have better liaison with higher up I.e. IAS hence post of chief which should be for co ordination with ministries and state authorities be given to IPS and Head of Operations, HR,Provision Director Academies and head of Command must be a CAPF officer. CAPF has much much experienced officer to lead the force. Once again there must be a big NO form phased out Army officers.

    Like

    1. Sir, it seems to me that you have not read my article. And whatever you have read, you have not understood.

      Kindly read again. In the article, I have asked for the Indian Army to move back from the LoC and hand over the LOC to the border guarding force/ CAPF. I have also mentioned that BSF artillery is very old and outdated. Similarly, the tactics required at IB and LoC are very different.

      Across the LoC BSF will face 155 mm and 203 mm artillery of Pak Army. BSF currently does not have an answer to that. It does not have those weapons and manpower.

      That’s why Army has to train BSF and then move out.

      I request you again to read the entire article.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. LOC is tasked to Indian Army in our side and Pak army in counterpart. As per present task of BSF , BSf don’t requires heavy aur medium artillery. We have FD artillery in limited quantity only due to historical reason not tactical. And one more thing our field guns are similar or better than Army. I am not writing caliber and names due to security reason but u can confirm by your own sources

        Like

      2. Have you read the article? Kindly read why I have written this.

        In the article, I have suggested that the Indian Army should move away from the LoC and except for some areas, hand over LoC to CAPF.

        Once this is done, BSF will come face to face with Pak Army. Hence, I have called for upgrades of weapons and equipment and training.

        I have called for army to be deployed in Africa and Central Asia. Kindly read again.

        Like

  3. Kasam se maj Saab puri dil ki baat boldiye aap..its like a Xerox copy of my views on CAPF sir..we need to get CAPF out of this police mentality from all sides starting from leadership to uniforms and ranks..been following u for long sir.read every article of urs..ur damn right to the point in every one ..may god bless u sir..stay healthy..JAI HIND sir

    Like

      1. Ur most welcome sir..a request sir, if u consider..plzz write an article on kidon and special group, sir..only few know about these two almost mythical ghost units of mossad and R&AW..

        Like

      2. I am really surprised why some people are misunderstanding your views on the article ” The Others” inspite of your lucid communications skills. As a devoted Indian citizen I sincerely support your view. We as a nation need to come out of our shell and think strategically as well as globally

        Like

  4. MGA, you have featured the CAPFs extensively on Patriot. Thank you for that, without it we would have known little to nothing about them. Logical thinking says that the officer was right- if they are good enough to fight and die if necessary, they must be good enough to lead. Why was the Force designed not to have its own leaders in the first place? Also, there would be officers who have risen in rank in these Forces, could they accept the leadership sooner from an Indian Army General. Or is the longer time line (about 15 years) presented so the DNA of the Force changes as you groom a direct entry level officer to the leadership level? MGA, change will not be accepted gently. This one could be challenging.

    Like

  5. Read your two articles until now and found that society need people like you alot. You are on doing your Job and same time you are influencing people by your another skill which is writing your fabulous opinion in a perfect way.
    Regarding this topic the correct way is Second way where we strongly need the Homeland Security inside, same has been faced at various times but the worst example is 26/11 where so called ( I’m sorry to call it so called) current Homeland Security “police” had no idea that how to handle in that situation. Its the fact that changes gonna take time but at the end second way is the best way.

    Like

  6. Sir I respect u alot but question is that army itself don’t want capf to rise. Earlier they question on wearing combant dress.other thing you are talking about 55 years old inspector ,this is because their pay is similar to civil matrix they are not getting huge salary like army.For survival of their family they have to perform duty till 57..If govt will give them ex service benefits they will definitely get retired at younger age. It is really matter of surprise that when Goa govt given them benefit than your rehabilitation department write that it should not be given to them.As far duty is concern it is prove in uri attack that they were not able to controller terrorist .on the other hand when same happen with crpf they eliminate without casualty..I don’t to write more………but as far bsf duty concern ….they are best..even at war..time
    By the way this matter is under discussion to create a national academy for all capf officers.
    Jai hind🇮🇳

    Like

  7. Major Arya,
    A good read, but that’s all to it nothing more. Don’t get me wrong here.
    I am not sure if you have consulted any serving or retired CAPF officer ( atleast a BSF officer) before writing your narrative. No doubt you have espoused a great future for the CAPF, but your narrative is entirely dripped in olive green. It’s like us v/s them. Us is definitely Army and Them is no doubt IPS. I do not want to take away your idea about how we develop the CAPF better, but it would be really nice to have heard a good number of field serving Commandant /DIG level officers before arriving at any definitive conclusion.
    Ranks really do not matter much as it’s more about getting the task completed which is the case even now in CAPF with the IPS at the helm. I am no great supporter of having an IPS officer sit over cadre officers myself, but also would not like to let the CAPF turn olive green in the process of so called change. The present set of senior officers working as DIG and IG are more than competent enough to take care of the force and do not need any gestation period of 15 years to take command. I did 20 years (Retired Voluntarily) and at no point in time I ever found myself less skilful and deficient in taking the force ahead.
    And last but not the least, IPS ain’t no spring chickens to vacate their playing field for someone else. They after all own the Political field as you once owned the Tactical/ defence field, Won’t you agree on that?
    And ofcourse, I did read your narrative once very carefully and once was enough. But ofcourse, I don’t take anything away from you. A good analysis, but it smacks of olive green against Khaki. Cut some slack for CAPF and for God’s sake ask them how they want it?
    PS: And may I ask what will our Army do in Central Asia and Africa ? Don’t they have their own military to take care of their land? Who is going to invite us except maybe in Afghanistan that too because US have soiled its hand red there!!
    Unless you are privy to some top secret info which ofcourse I wouldn’t be aware off, I wouldn’t venture out to send out our Army to various continents without any mandate. I am sure you know that as per constitution, our military is a defence force and we do not have any such plans in near future to have any expeditionary force operating in some other countries like US.

    Well and truly Yours

    Like

    1. Sir,

      Yes, I consulted with a lot of CAPF officers. My father is an IPS Officer and was Director General of BSF, NSG and ITBP. I have consulted a few cadre and IPS officers also.

      I would recommend that you read the article again. It’s a thought process. It’s my view.

      The government wants bases outside the country. There is a thinking that we must have a presence in Africa and Central Asia. Why? Because of China. We have to counter their influence. We built Chabahar because Pak was not giving us overland route to Afghanistan. If we don’t have overseas bases, China will encircle us.

      Sir, I come from a family of IPS officers and I respect them. But this is not their job.

      Now, if army moves back from LoC, what are the chances that BSF will be able to confront Pak Army?

      We need Indian Army, Navy and Air Force to operate outside India. We want to be a superpower. We want to sit at the UNSC table. But is it possible without outward projection of power? No.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Hi Maj Gaurav,
        Good to know. I respect your views as said previously too. Although I don’t come from an IPS family, but my father has been an instructor to IPS officers in SVP NPA for 20 long years and I too have lived 17 years in NPA and as such know pretty well with regard to their prowess.
        Now coming to the point, Firstly,
        sending any expeditionary force would imply change/ amendment in the constitution. Will the opposition agree to that and if so when? Remember GST circus?
        Secondly for Academic purpose ofcourse, If IBG is replacing the existing Army from the LC then do we have the wherewithal, experience, logistics, ethos required to carry out or replicate the mighty Army’s role? Are we expected to imbibe them in 15 short years while it took some regiments up to 300 years to achieve? On LC, it’s the troops from section to Battalion level who have to adapt to these changes. We don’t need top officials to reorientate as it wouldn’t take time for them to change their mindset but a Sep Bhoop Singh on ground needs to have that belief that he is indeed the last man standing between an invader and the crushed. And that my dear sir isn’t possible in 15 years. It’s a generational change.
        My view is, increase the Army numbers to fight the Paki regulars instead of opening up a new vista for existing CAPF which are already neck deep with its share of shackles with all its concomitant problems.
        Thirdly,tell us which govt official has officially informed the Parliament or the people of this free country that we need military bases out of the country? We have not even accepted the military role offered to us in Afghanistan by the US. We are even reluctant to get in any conflict with ISIS directly.
        I think being presumptuous about our foreign role without understanding its ramifications in the long term would not hold us in good stead. After all China which is much more developed than us has just started and that too on limited scale. Look at what happened to USSR when it started it’s military aggrandisement.
        India as a budding super power needs to develop its core economic/ industrial might to be able to absorb/withstand the political and diplomatic shocks which comes with the installation of bases outside. Otherwise we fall flat on the face as we did in 1998 after Pokhran.
        And with the opposition that we have who are more interested in keeping the poor poorer, it’s a utopian dream. Who will buy this dream project from Modi with sharks like Chidambaram, Mani Shankar Iyer, Kapil Sibal , Digvijay Singh, Kamalnath etc waiting to pounce on Modi for the slightest of errors. Modi needs a populace like Israel or certain other countries having self belief to achieve what you are propagating which in essence is very good.
        In India,when the self belief of one person is being questioned, lampooned and made a butt of jokes by some of our own countrymen, you needn’t go too far to see the ultimate result of such grandiose idea dare I say that.

        And in the meantime, in my very personal view, Let’s continue with the present set of rules of engagement and if at all who need to be replaced, it is the IPS from the top positions of every CAPF from DG,IG,DIG level wherein it will create a vacancy for roughly 100 to 120 positions for the respective cadre officers to assume the charge.
        IPS are proficient and clever enough to create for themselves these ‘given up’positions in their state cadres and fulfill their aspirations.
        It’s the aspirations of Cadre officers of CAPF which have been long trampelled howsoever it may have been.

        My views may not be presumed as an affront to yours. This is what I feel and am sure most serving senior level serving officers too feel the same and some would surely vouch for me in BSF.

        It was nice to have an extended interaction with you.

        Well and truly yours.

        Like

      2. Why BSF will confront alone with Pak Army? Why country is expending 52 times more than BSF on Indian Army? Do u want to convert Indian Army into a mercenary force. It is against the mandate and ethos

        Like

  8. The way you glorify the Indian army in the article must b bcoz of the highest respect for it bt I respect my force in the same line like you and I strongly repeal the idea of bringing of army officer’s in our forces for 15 years.Having served in BSF for more than 13 years I can assure you this force has vast experience of cross border firings, fighting terrorism and insurgency apart from its borders duties and our officer’s n mens are well capable of taking care of our force in all capacity. It is the only leadership of our cadre officer’s dat dis force is surviving in all toughest and inhospitable terrains and performing outstandingly at every theatre whether we talk abt thar desert, kutch rann, kashmir militancy, naxals or NE insurgency. Regarding training how a bordermen trains one should have taste of our birthplace where many officer’s think twice before under going rigorous trg there.If contribution is to be made den it should be realistic and not to made someone to live in fools paradise again for next 15 years.
    Regards.

    Like

    1. Sir,

      It seems that you have not read the article fully. I suggest that you do.

      In the article, I have recommended that Indian Army move back from LoC to rear areas and that India set up bases abroad. If Indian Army moves to the rear areas, that will put BSF in direct conflict with Pakistan Army. This will mean a change in role for BSF because in majority of cases, BSF is alongside the IB.

      BSF is an excellent force. I know BSF well. I have operated with BSF in Kashmir. My father spent his life in BSF, ITBP & NSG. He was Director BSF Academy, Tekanpur and later in 1993-94, took over as DG BSF. He was DG ITBP and NSG. When I was born in 1972, my father was Commandant 2nd Battalion of ITBP. He is a 1960 batch IPS Officer of MP Cadre.

      Kindly read my article again. I have highest respect for CAPF officers. However, I am asking for the complete role to be changed. There must be change in training, ethos and delivery.

      BSF must have medium artillery, if you are to fight Pak Army along the LoC. Tactics will have to change. With current capabilities, BSF cannot fight Pak Army. BSF is a defensive force, not an offensive one.

      In the New scenario that I am recommending, Indian Army will move back and BSF will be facing Chinese Army in places like Dokalam.

      Sir, it is important for you to read the article again and understand the concept before coming to a conclusion. In the article, the current role of CAPFs will drastically change. That will lead to complete change in weapons, training and equipment. BSF will be introduced to heavy weapons and light moving armour. It’s an entirely new concept for CAPFs. It takes time to get used to a new weapons system. It’s not like a rifle where you can do a capsule course for 3 weeks and learn.

      If you are introduced to light armour, it may take a decade of training to get the drift of the tactics.

      Look forward to discussing with you after you have given the article another look.

      Warm Regards
      MGA

      Liked by 1 person

  9. Dear sir
    I respect u alot but according to you Indian army is a aggressive force as far capf duty concern some capf have to deal with civil that’s why they can’t adopt the aggressive policy.As you mentioned that bsf training should be similar to army sir mostly instructor in bsf academy is retired Brigadier level officer. If will start counting the operation of bsf this comment box will not be enough for me eg…operation Gazi baba..As you mentioned that they these border forces should combine I definitely agree because than these will get good transfer policy also..As years back MHA reports mostly itbpf official (retired) faced problem after retirement..because for life time they operated in snow.If this proposal will pass definately that will be boon…as you mentioned a constructive policy .One retired Brigadier writes in his letter to ministry that bsf should be broken into two part .one for indo Pak and second for Bangladesh border..As for artillery concern you know very well annual budget of MHA do you think they can provide medium artillary those who are still providing old weapon,duty hours a capf personal spend.Sir I am definately sure if such matter will come in parliament defence will oppose it.As u know situation in loc also how one force is not cooperating with other.much I don’t want to write…..
    Jai hind.

    Like

    1. Sir,

      My article is not about the present scenario of the army or BSF. It’s about the future. It’s about what it should be in the future.

      Current capabilities of both army and BSF are not good enough. Both forces have done a million Operations but that is not good enough. They must evolve. There is a new threat. It must be met with a new mindset.

      Like

  10. Mga i have gone through the each words of your article and got the insidious aim also which you want to convey here.since u have invited me for further discussons Please take my honest approach to ur post in bettering or rethink on ur article.
    Your plan to make India a superpower by establishing bases in afrikaa,h/o borders to capf in phase manner n seat in unsc is quite charming and dashing but could u please tell me our armed forces capf n Indian govt r ready for this whole exercise.at least fm govt side I m sure dey r not.countries becomes superpower firstly by solving dere internal issues and determination of our govt is well known world wide over dis.secondaly govt will spare capf for ur purpose I dbt bcoz capf has adopted a combatant and non combatant strategy in consonance with govt policy which suits govt very much n govt will let this force in dere non interested area I doubt.
    Before ur plan
    Wat require is first govt should solve very pertinent issues of capf n give dem dere share of sky den it
    show some result oriented stiffness in tackling internal naxal militancy n insurgency in the country and lastly create vision like you for the country bt I’m sure govt will remain quite solemn on it n somehow if you persuade dem it will take 15 years to them to reach at any conclusion.
    Moreover In Country present scenario ur plan also seems to be a fiasco where patriotism counts only by hitting sixes in any cricket match or anyone who speaks against Pakistan rather than receiving a bullets by a soldier at Borders for the country.
    Regards.

    Like

      1. MGA, your article was at no point disrespectful to anyone or any Force. But what is told as a response here is just a downright personal attack- no facts, depth or clarity, just finger pointing and sly personal remarks. He has just made it a you vs them and it seems your primary purpose of giving CAPF their due is lost on this response. MGA, you have nothing to prove to anyone. Keep going.

        Liked by 1 person

  11. IPS is a bad choice for CAPF. Barring few like Rustamji, Mr Prakash Singh none has good reputation in BSF. But army officers replacing them is worst choice.

    Like

    1. Sir, Army officers are not replacing anyone. Kindly read the article. It’s about outward projection of force. China is making bases outside…South China Sea, Africa, Sri Lanka etc…they are making bases and cutting us off. We too have to go outside India or China will choke us.

      Army respects CAPF but is not interested in it. My point is this…IF the plan is to make bases outside India, to counter China…someone must man the LoC. If that someone is BSF, it will mean change in equipment.

      Like

  12. Jay hind sir,SOME people say CAPFs are civilian they are not soldiers,even our government and 7th pay commission pointed they are civilion.YOU are correct sir govt treat them stepchildren,but they are soldiers firstly and lastly.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Major gaurav , my heartiest thanks to you for taking up this issue . My father is a serving BSF commandant, a rank in which he has been stuck for almost and decade now due to the BSF having undeserving and inexperienced police officers fill it’s higher post. and from what I have heard the officer fraternity is really thankful and happy for you to take up this issue except for the part where you have suggested the army way. One more suggestion I would like to add is that the BSF should adopt the army way way of promotions to ranks above 2IC in which you have to be cleared by a board to get a promotion. I would like to point out here that this suggestion is not my own but what I have heard retired and experienced officers discuss themselves .

    Like

  14. Sir, I just recently came across this blog where you’ve articulated the thoughts about reforms in CAPFs very well.
    Though I agree to most of the points you have raised in this article, there are however a few points that I would like you to consider as well

    1. You spoke of abolishing recruitment at JCO/ASI level which I feel will be a complete disaster. Infact, having compared both CAPF and Army models for so long, I feel this is one place where the CAPFs are doing better than the Army. Case in point is your own observation that age ceiling of 25 must be implemented for recruitment of CAPF Officers so that the force remains lean. However many a times in army a JCO who is well over 35 years of age is asked to lead a platoon for CI ops. For e.g Nb Sub Chuni Lal AC VrC SM was 39 years old when he was martyred in line of duty. However we see very few army officers martyred above the rank of Major, who becomes a Lt. Colonel at around 34-35 years of age (Granted there are exceptions like Col Santosh Mahadik AC), but the cases of JCOs dying in line of duty is much higher than the officers of the rank Lt. Col and higher. Therefore an ASI/SI selected at the age of 22-23 years is a much more lean fighting machine than a JCO at 35-36 years of age (given the same amount of training). And we see platoons of BSF and CRPF being commanded by a young SI/Inspector during border patrols or anti-naxal ops. My solution has always been to introduce a three layered recruitment process which is

    a. At Sepoy and equivalent ranks
    b. At JCO and equivalent ranks
    c. At Officer and equivalent ranks

    Promotional ceiling for sepoys till the rank of Sub Maj, of direct JCOs to Major (a direct JCO after 18/20 years of service be granted a rank of Lt, Capt and at the end of service Maj). This will not only help the army in battling the acute shortage of officers it faces but also help in better logistics allocation as well. This will provide more opportunities to the educated youth who aren’t qualified to join as an officer but their aspirations are high enough to not join a jawaans either. This is similar to how graduate degree holders go for SSC-CPO and SSC-CGL. A solution similar to mine was suggested some time ago for Assam Rifles, where the idea of a separate officer cadre was mooted, because by the time an AR jawaan reaches the rank of 2IC, he gets pretty old and is fit only for administrative duties.

    2. What you’ve suggested sounds a lot like militarization of CAPFs, which I am not much in favour of, though granted they need much more efficient training schools and programs. I believe the LoC should be guarded only by the Indian Army, and rest of the IB by BSF/ITBP headed by an army officer on deputation at ground level, though the head of organisation should be a career CAPF/IPS officer (much like NSG)

    3. A separate cadre for IPS officers can be considered where along with state cadres they have an option of choosing Central Police cadre at the beginning of their career itself. This will make sure that the IPS officers are connected to the ground realities of the problems of the force and they too can become a career BSF/ITBP/CISF/SSB/CRPF officer.

    I would really like to know your thoughts on this.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Sir,

      My article was not about reforms in CAPFs. At least, that was not my intent. What the CAPFs do is their outlook. I think they are doing a fine job.

      Also, militarisation of CAPFs in my article is in a context. It’s not about the CAPFs or the IPS. The problem is China.

      I am taking the liberty of sending you an article that i wrote after THE OTHERS. You have possibly read THE OTHERS. Do read RIPOSTE.

      Warm Regards

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment